I will look at Hubble before I respond to post below or write more myself. I haven't yet read your post below before posting these questions. After looking at Hubble, I will repond to Hubble experience and to your post below. But I would like to post the following questions I've composed for your consideration in upcoming posts.
1. Do you see any notion of a claim to freedom or autonomy on the part of scientists? If so, what's the nature of this claim to freedom? Is it freedom "to" something, or freedom "from" something?
2. Does this claim to freedom relate in any way to the claim to freedom or autonomy on the part of artists?
3. Does this claim to freedom relate in anyway to the claim to freedom of capitalists?
4. Is science an aesthetic activity?
5. Are scientists artists? (or visa versa) Is there some relationship between art and science?
6. How does this relate to the ideas of "interesting" versus "boring" that you mention. In other words, what is the significance to you of the spectrum of interesting--boring as a measure of value?