Metadelusion

Delusion about delusion. “I’d rather be lonely and right than popular and wrong.” –Chris Korda

Friday, June 29, 2012

Science background reading

›
I did some background reading on science before my previous post. It seems both our positions fit reasonably well into known categories. My ...
Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Interesting stuff

›
There's stuff, in patterns. Patterns emerge from the stuff. Stuff emerges from the patterns. One or the other description may be more us...
Monday, June 25, 2012

›
Question 4 appears to be a trap. If I say that science is aesthetic, then it's merely subjective, in which case how is it any more ...
3 comments:

›
I will look at Hubble before I respond to post below or write more myself.  I haven't yet read your post below before posting these ques...
Sunday, June 24, 2012

›
From my point of view the allegation that science is a delusion is as bizarre as Christians claiming to talk to Jesus every morning. It...

›
"whether our 'true nature,' fate and destiny is to live in competition and domination (power) or symbiosis and mutuality (whole...

›
A note about blogging: Because I have never blogged before, as we discussed, I am experiencing culture shock about how radically the blog...

›
"Are you opposed to power, on the grounds that authority is impossible without it?" This question is unanswerable to me becau...

›
On question 4, concerning the fate of the human species in terms of millions of years, this is the kind of question that contains so many of...

›
A first thought.  I am using the term "pure science" to refer to that science which distinguishes itself from applied science, and...
Saturday, June 23, 2012

Unanswered previous questions

›
What scientist would willingly be called impure? Where is the journal of impure science?  Should Jasper Johns' paintings be destroye...

›
Reminder notes: issues arising within this conversation: what is the purpose of the conversation? - is the aim that one convinces the other...
Friday, June 22, 2012

›
Hi Chris !  Can't believe you got all this in here.  Is there a way to reverse the order or is always latest most recent?

›
I hope you'll include this discussion of the title in the blog!

›
sounds good.

›
FWIW here's a style reference supporting my contention that the hyphen is unnecessary . meta-analysis <= hyphen is required because ...

›
Hyphens aren't allowed in the blog URL, but I'm OK with using one in the title (which appears on each page) if you think it's im...

›
Sounds ok, but would a hypen be good?

›
I like structuraldelusion, but not collapseofcivilization which seems too general. Spiritual Liquidation was actually an anti-spiritual...

›
How about  metadelusion?? It has a similar meaning but it's shorter and catchier and only has very few hits in Google which is g...

›
I understand about the Ted issue and agree. I guess I don't want to use the word spiritual because I equate spirituality with delusio...

›
also available: collapseofcivilization structuraldelusion

›
I don't like surrogate activities, because that's Ted's thing and I don't want to have Ted's ideas about science come...

›
surrogateactivities is available! It's from a list I have of slogans you came up with. I tried mistakesweremade but it's already tak...

›
I'd just like to understand whether it's a blog that only we know about it, or if it's public in the sense of being of being pa...

›
OK I'll see what I can do. I think a blog would be the easiest, because they're dead easy to set up and don't require any mai...

›
That sounds fine, except that I wouldn't want to have to worry too much about expressing myself in good form.  I'm not sure if you ...

›
Would you be amenable to my making our dialogue into a web page? I could redact it to remove names or any other personal or identifying i...

›
I'm at work.  I'm sorry for not responding to the questions you raised, and I can't spend time right now with your current em...

›
The distinction you make between science and pure science has no basis in fact. There is no such category as pure science. What scientist ...

›
There are two easy to address areas where I think you misunderstand me. One is, I am not at all confused about the separation between th...
Tuesday, June 19, 2012

›
I am furiously applying my Buddhist awareness to your latest missive. Have you heard the Mark Twain, "He had the cool, calm conf...

›
PS: One of my all-time favorite quotes is from the movie "Providence" (dir. Alain Resnais). Towards the end, Clive Langham (pla...

›
I included a link to a famous Hubble telescope image in one of my previous replies. Here it is again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:...

›
Thanks for the detail and I will think about it (I'm at work), it's very interesting. It's funny but one reason I thought of ...

›
I haven't read Kuhn but I already understand his premise (as described e.g. in Wikipedia) well enough to know I'm not interested. I...

›
I need to consider your responses, and appreciate the detail. But you misunderstand me if you think I want to fight the universe so tha...

›
My (chilled down) question would be, have you read Thomas Kuhn?  I don't mean you should have, but the comment you made about Kuhn --...

›
I wanted to write you an email before reading your reactions to my emotional and impulsive emails written last night.  I really want to e...

›
"Are you saying that your don't think that your human brain imposes a reductive structure upon your perception of reality?" T...

›
I feel as though when I question your ideas you get pissed off or hurt. I need to respond because you are putting out very powerful argu...

›
Thomas Kuhn held that theory choice is irrational. This is a minority position in the philosophy of science. He by no means succeeded in ...

›
"let's take geoengineering as an example of science in action." You're confusing science with the ethics of its applicati...

›
Buddhism is the opposite of narcissism.  This entry has no concept of what buddhism is about.  There is NOTHING comforting about buddhism. ...

›
It's very hard for me to express to you how powerfully you impose your structure upon the conversation. Are you saying that your don...

›
" I hope that you do don't experience this as hostile, " LOL! Which is it, do or don't? Could this be a Freudian slip...

›
what does "falsifiable" mean? let's take geoengineering as an example of science in action. Isn't it delusional?

›
for instance, malignancy just means "bad". It's a value judgment, not a fact.

›
PS: I agree 100% with the enclosed. "All religions, including Buddhism, stem from our narcissistic wish to believe that the univers...

›
In human beings, the inputs and the outputs are unpredictable.

›
It's late, and I can only read this quickly now, But I appreciate your responding. There is an extreme mismatch in the way we thi...

›
I couldn't disagree more, sorry to say. Our positions seem totally irreconcilable. "humans have thought structures that they mist...
Monday, June 18, 2012

›
I think that generally, a delusion is that we see content, but don't see structure (the higher level). For instance, people see individu...

›
I was thinking about an idea about translating the stock market index number into musical tones so that you could hear the stock market.  Al...
Thursday, June 14, 2012

›
Antihumanism is a relatively new philosophy, which emerged along with critique of industrialism in the modern era, particularly after WWI. A...
Sunday, April 8, 2012

Less

›
Less government. Less business. Less wealth. Less power. Less roads. Less buildings. Less food. Less people. Less is coming. Less is already...
3 comments:
‹
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Chris Korda
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.